<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Drown Mommy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.navalgazing.com/2008/03/05/dont-drown-mommy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.navalgazing.com/2008/03/05/dont-drown-mommy/</link>
	<description>the perspective of a military family . . . the narcissism of a blog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: gazer</title>
		<link>http://www.navalgazing.com/2008/03/05/dont-drown-mommy/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>gazer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 19:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navalgazing.com/2008/03/05/dont-drown-mommy/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>The President vetoed the bill, which would have limited the CIA to the interrogation methods in the Army manual. The Army manual finds some of these methods, including waterboarding, to be of limited value in collecting good intelligence. It seems to me that either we torture people or we don't, and the distinction between the Army and CIA is lost on other countries.

From CNN:
"Among the techniques the field manual prohibits are hooding prisoners or putting duct tape across their eyes, stripping them naked, forcing them to perform or mimic sexual acts, or beating, electrocuting, burning or otherwise physically hurting them. 

They may not be subjected to hypothermia or mock executions. It does not allow food, water and medical treatment to be withheld. Dogs may not be used in any aspect of interrogation.

But waterboarding is the most high-profile and controversial of the interrogation methods in question.
* * *
[Waterboarding] has been traced back hundreds of years to the Spanish Inquisition and is condemned by nations around the world and human rights organizations as torture.

* * *

Others say that, even if legal, there are practical arguments against waterboarding: that its use would undermine the U.S. when arguing overseas for human rights and on other moral issues and would place Americans at greater risk of being tortured when captured.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The President vetoed the bill, which would have limited the CIA to the interrogation methods in the Army manual. The Army manual finds some of these methods, including waterboarding, to be of limited value in collecting good intelligence. It seems to me that either we torture people or we don&#8217;t, and the distinction between the Army and CIA is lost on other countries.</p>
<p>From CNN:<br />
&#8220;Among the techniques the field manual prohibits are hooding prisoners or putting duct tape across their eyes, stripping them naked, forcing them to perform or mimic sexual acts, or beating, electrocuting, burning or otherwise physically hurting them. </p>
<p>They may not be subjected to hypothermia or mock executions. It does not allow food, water and medical treatment to be withheld. Dogs may not be used in any aspect of interrogation.</p>
<p>But waterboarding is the most high-profile and controversial of the interrogation methods in question.<br />
* * *<br />
[Waterboarding] has been traced back hundreds of years to the Spanish Inquisition and is condemned by nations around the world and human rights organizations as torture.</p>
<p>* * *</p>
<p>Others say that, even if legal, there are practical arguments against waterboarding: that its use would undermine the U.S. when arguing overseas for human rights and on other moral issues and would place Americans at greater risk of being tortured when captured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.navalgazing.com/2008/03/05/dont-drown-mommy/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 20:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navalgazing.com/2008/03/05/dont-drown-mommy/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>McCain is pathetic. His embrace of the radical right makes me sick. I lost a huge amount of respect for him when he hugged Bush after the 2000 primary. This was, you'll remember, after Bush and Rove insinuated to South Carolina voters that he had fathered a black love child.  He could have told the truth there at the convention, but instead he hugged Bush. He sold his soul to the devil. Then, it was downhill from there. Before you knew it, he was speaking at Bob Jones University, making love to lobbyists, and embracing torture. McCain was a good man, and he could have been a great leader. Instead he decided to play ball with the fundamentalists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McCain is pathetic. His embrace of the radical right makes me sick. I lost a huge amount of respect for him when he hugged Bush after the 2000 primary. This was, you&#8217;ll remember, after Bush and Rove insinuated to South Carolina voters that he had fathered a black love child.  He could have told the truth there at the convention, but instead he hugged Bush. He sold his soul to the devil. Then, it was downhill from there. Before you knew it, he was speaking at Bob Jones University, making love to lobbyists, and embracing torture. McCain was a good man, and he could have been a great leader. Instead he decided to play ball with the fundamentalists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kimba</title>
		<link>http://www.navalgazing.com/2008/03/05/dont-drown-mommy/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>kimba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.navalgazing.com/2008/03/05/dont-drown-mommy/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>I do, too! But really, we all know the answer - and this debate is nothing short of shameful. I just want to push reset and go back to the (relatively) sane 1990's.

319 days. *sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do, too! But really, we all know the answer - and this debate is nothing short of shameful. I just want to push reset and go back to the (relatively) sane 1990&#8217;s.</p>
<p>319 days. *sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
